Peter Attia· MD
the original papers that said what you just said turned out to be using an essay for IIs that was highly inaccurate in the sense that they overestimated the actual concentration of IIs by a factor of about a hundred
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the original papers that said what you just said turned out to be using an essay for IIs that was highly inaccurate in the sense that they overestimated the actual concentration of IIs by a factor of about a hundred
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.