The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's evolutionarily in the best interest of this virus to become less and less virulent as it goes on and if it wants to co-exist with us indefinitely it probably shouldn't be killing us you referenced obviously the spanish flu in 1918 as it went from this deadly pandemic into basically the fluke the thing that we have every year
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.