The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the number of what we're talking about here is the are not which is the fancy medical word for how many people will you in fact if you have the virus and we know there are some people who are asymptomatic and they can shed when they're asymptomatic and if you look at the are not for the flu it's slow I think I've thought my head is 1.2 or 1.4 meaning that everyone who gets the flu will in fact 1.2 to 1.4 people with the flu
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now they are not for the flu every year is 1.2 at 1.4 something like that it's pretty low