The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then we have what's called gradient imaging and so that's actually you're not waiting for it to completely return back to normal but somewhere in the middle you're actually kind of repulsing again so you're basically hearing that noise of the machine turning back on and saying you know we're not gonna wait to a completely relaxed we're gonna fire up again and just give us a sense of the actual time
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.