The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a lot of cases where the exposure based on our 50 mil deceiver rule we talked about would make people fall out of their chair but the the actual reality of it is is that many times the the actual end results aren't as bad as we had expected
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so there's a lot of cases where the exposure based on our 50 mil deceiver rule we talked about would just make people fall out of their chair but the the actual reality of it is is that many times the the actual end results aren't as bad as we had expected