Peter Attia· MD
if you make a wound in an animal a week or two after you make a laceration wound at the wound site you will see an accumulation of senescence cells and they're dumping SAS factors into the wound
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you make a wound in an animal a week or two after you make a laceration wound at the wound site you will see an accumulation of senescence cells and they're dumping SAS factors into the wound
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in this experiment they went in and they eliminated senescence cells in the course of wound healing and what they saw was that the wound closed less well and more slowly and it suggested that the SAS p-- had another role wasn't just well assassin this is a role for this a spear its role was to facilitate wound closure