The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the Warburg effect I mean I think Otto Warburg described it as insufficient respiration or oxidative phosphorylation we talked about a little bit with compensatory fermentation and I think my colleague Tom safer it would describe the and I would - the insufficient respiration a result of mitochondrial damage without a doubt
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in the majority of cancers 90% of cancers we see this Warburg effect with damaged mitochondria