The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
unlike C 9 it not only cleaves the recognized RNA but once it recognizes piece of RNA it also turns on almost a suicidal function it goes and Cleaves any other RNA that's in the bacterial cell and so in the infection cycle um you can think of this as a altruistic um sort of uh uh system where um when a when when the CER te recognizes um my my my cell has been infected by RNA virus I'm going to shut myself down kill the cell and save the population
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.