The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Yes, we have a resource that nature provides us. Use it. I mean, that's essentially what what I wanna say. And so, yes, we may be smarter than nature at a certain point to doing certain things. But at this point, why don't we use it?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And both of them are aimed for the same thing, those cells in cord blood could be used to transplant if somebody needs a bone marrow transplant.