The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I usually pull out all the graphs i show them dose volume histograms with area under the curve for each organ and you can see okay the prostate dose area under the curve is huge the dose of the bladder and the rectum is super low you can actually quantify that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I usually pull out all the graphs I show them dose volume histograms with area under the curve for each organ and you can see okay the prostate dose a of the curve is huge the dose of the bladder and the rectum is super low you can actually Quant ify that