Peter Attia· MD
that doesn't only come with a little bit of risk in this case radiation although it's a almost trivial amount but I think more than anything it's the risk of the emotional discomfort associated with that
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
that doesn't only come with a little bit of risk in this case radiation although it's a almost trivial amount but I think more than anything it's the risk of the emotional discomfort associated with that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Uh, the real risk of this study, um, which does not involve contrast or anything like that, is the false positives.