The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
A non-invasive way where presumably you're putting electrodes all over a head that's as well shorn as mine. Um, alternatively, a very invasive way where you actually remove the scalp and you lay these things on the cortex itself. Correct. Yeah. So the range would be EEG which is where sensors are placed on the scalp directly recording non-invasively.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.