The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the second repair process is called homology directed repair HDR and this relies on a template DNA that carries the sequence that you're trying to repair with and so if you make a cut and you also provide a template DNA then the repair process will copy whatever that's on a template into the DNA break site
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the second repair process is called homology directed repair HDR and this relies on a template DNA that carries the sequence that you're trying to repair with and so if you make a cut and you also provide a template DNA then the repair process will copy whatever that's on a template into the DNA brake site and this is a more powerful way to be able to change the DNA sequence in in a designed fashion