The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
how hard it is to go back up because now here you are at the bottom and you've spent all this time and energy justifying your decision to cheat or not cheat how are you going to now go back and say you know that first step i took off the pyramid was really the wrong one
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they start out at the top side by side but by the time they have finished justifying one step at a time their own behavior they stand at the bottom of the pyramid very far apart from each other