The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you know when you think about kind of tribes that you know honey and um you know berries for instance you don't get that all that often in nature you don't find it's something that you come across here and there so these kind of foods were relatively rare but the people could could eat them because they had these diverse microbiomes and it didn't really affect them metabolically
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so what we have today is a very um a very undiverse uh microbiome compared to what before so we're very susceptible to this sugar