The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if a patient says to me hey why aren't you doing this biologic age clock on me yeah my response is well I know your V2 Max I know your Zone 2 I know your muscle mass I I know your visceral fat I know we did a very complicated movement assessment on you I understand your balance I understand uh like your lipids your insulin like I know these 57 things about you and I can tell you individually on each of them how you're doing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.