The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
those of us who are eating an animal-based diet don't have to worry because we're not getting very many of these non-protein amino acids in the first place and our diets are protective because they are very high in protein from meat and organs so again one of the most compelling things i found in that first paper i showed you was the notion that high protein diets brazil uruguay again this is just an association are protective against als
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.