The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so when I think just as a lay person thinking about the prostate gland I sort of think about inflammation infection I think about benign enlargement that leads to obstruction and then obviously we'll talk about neoplasm is that how you sort of think about the problems associated with it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I sort of think about inflammation infection I think about benign enlargement that leads to obstruction and then obviously we'll talk about neoplasm is that how you sort of think about the problems associated with it