Paul Saladino· MD
there's very compelling evidence from what are called stable isotope studies so this is a really interesting paper called evidence for dietary change but not landscape use in South African early homonyms
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's very compelling evidence from what are called stable isotope studies so this is a really interesting paper called evidence for dietary change but not landscape use in South African early homonyms
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you can see that the ratios of early homo habilis 1.8 million years ago these isotopes are essentially carnivorous