We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
when we're talking about things that are truly Superfluous uh like intelligence height athletic performance eye color any sort of trait those seem clearly like a horrible reason not for the um ethical reasons like well what does that say about disparity I forget all that it's the reasons you just said we have no idea complicated system if you're going to take a huge risk there has to be a huge Poff and the asymmetry of that strikes me as too much
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.