Paul Saladino· MD
And that is not just aesthetics. That is an indication of a breakdown of all of these tissues in your body.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And that is not just aesthetics. That is an indication of a breakdown of all of these tissues in your body.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So if somebody goes from being non-diabetic presumably they're having a fasting glucose of 80 and an average blood glucose of 85 with a hemoglobin A1C of what would that be? 4.6 or something? Who knows? Then you go to a diabetic range where someone have average blood glucose of 160 you're looking years and years older than you would normally