The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there is actually an enormous variability in the way that people make neutralizing antibodies there's a paper under consideration coronavirus at the moment from a very very good lab Rockefeller they looked at I think it was 70 individuals and they look for the presence of neutralizing antibodies and they found that almost 20% of them did not make neutralizing antibodies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.