Peter Attia· MD
unless it's very very broad usually you don't see someone back 10 years later who needs another injection but if I did I'd be willing to do that again because everything has normalized physiologically at that point
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
unless it's very very broad usually you don't see someone back 10 years later who needs another injection but if I did I'd be willing to do that again because everything has normalized physiologically at that point
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.