Rhonda Patrick· PhD
This was another study done, they took samples pre-pandemic, there should be no people with spike protein pre-pandemic, and they were showing that they had spike protein.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
This was another study done, they took samples pre-pandemic, there should be no people with spike protein pre-pandemic, and they were showing that they had spike protein.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.