The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we may uh get to the point of talking about ductal carcinoma in citu or dcis which um is a precancerous lesion where the cells are beginning to accumulate within the duct but have not penetrated into the rest of the breast tissue and the analogy I give to patients all the time is this is like a colon poop it's a growth it is a precancerous growth we treat it so that it doesn't blossom into a full-blown cancer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we treat it so that it doesn't blossom into a full-blown cancer but in and of itself it is not a cancer
and in fact we may uh get to the point of talking about ductal carcinoma in citu or dcis which is a precancerous lesion where the cells are beginning to accumulate within the duct but have not penetrated into the rest of the breast tissue