The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you can have a sharp enough image you could theoretically see better than 2010 and the only way you can really achieve that is to remove some of the optical irregularities that we are all born with and somehow neutralize them along with the glasses prescription and we can actually do that with laser vision correction currently
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we've been able to achieve that with modern forms of laser vision correction