The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was a paper published in the New England Journal where if I remember the paper correctly this patient had a melanoma and then she had a massive she tried every treatment and she had a massive tumor under her left breast I think it was she was treated with an antibody that turns the t-cells back on and in a matter of weeks she now had a hole in her chest because the t-cells have just gone in wiped out the tumor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.