The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in fact if it's not in that position I'm wrong said Einstein right so Edington was one of the people that helped him confirm that by going to by the way is a nice little tie into everything do you know how Einstein died uh yes an abdominal aneurysm yeah that's right and he refused treatment yeah yeah he was like no he was in the 70s he's like no I'm I'm good
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
he he basically validated Einstein's prediction that's right so he said about all these Mysteries — which were unsettling and perplexing all the physicists of the era you know around 100 years ago — and and into the 30s and 40s — he said I'm paraphrasing here was something like — uh something we don't understand is doing we know not what that was his ultimate evaluation of like what's going on in the universe I I misspoke by the way I said photo electri effect it was general relativity that he observed in South Africa in South Africa I think seeing the eclipse right with the eclipse exactly it bent the Rays of light as Einstein predicted