The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and I guess as a result of that there was a lot of these research chemical companies were very quick to come out with you know uh free as dried like LIF aized fallest satin product that had one milligram per per vial and you would buy it for you know hundreds of dollars and then you would basically like shoot a vial a day or something of that nature and spend thousands over the course of a cycle which was based on you know no data at all
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.