The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so if you look at figure one it's a Kaplan Meyer curve which is a mortality curve so you'll see these in all sorts of studies so when the x-axis is always time and on the y-axis is always the cumulative survival so it's a curve that always goes from zero to one one or one hundred percent and it's always decreasing monotonically meaning it can only go down or stay flat it can never go back up
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.