The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well that's you know not rare frankly because the eye is so literally compartmentalized we just don't interact that much with other specialties so it's not rare for people who are in other specialties to be very ignorant of the eyeball and that's fine because i think it'll help us keep the level of discussion at an approachable level for everyone
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.