We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
basically modeling is now a fool's errand there's almost no role for modeling and a big part of it has to do with the fact that we don't have anything to put in the models so it's not the building of the models that's the fool's errand it's the blind faith that we would put in models especially when we don't get to put data into the models we put guesses
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.