The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we know droplet contact is going to be important people are coughing micro droplets onto surfaces and then people come into contact with it but their hands and not to inoculate those cells in the mucous membranes their eyes mouth or whether they're coughing directly into people's faces
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
my sense is what's your real risk your real risk is close personal contact with somebody with this virus I still think that's probably the most likely mode of transmission
whether we think you know you're gonna get this virus one you're definitely able to get this virus if you are within you know standing distance or somebody and you know you're a few feet or a few meters away and they're sick and they're coughing or if they're shedding virus onto a surface that you touch and you you know touch your face or something like that like you can absolutely get it that way and I think that's well established