Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
I think the issue with stem cells is that we don't know why it works for the people who it does work but it doesn't seem to be working because it's regrowing their cartilage so that's the big issue now it might be working as an anti-inflammatory it might be working as a placebo and it turns out as you're aware the sort of the bigger the procedure the better the placebo effect
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.