The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we do most of these now as I was talking about the technology earlier that we can do these percutaneously so we don't need five big big I mean these are only a centimeter and a half the biggest ones are only about a centimeter a centimeter and a half but the others they can be percutaneous tiny little holes that we use little cannulas through and then put the drill through and so forth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the others um they can be percutaneous tiny little holes that we use little canulas through and then put the drill through and so forth