Peter Attia· MD
And you're only I mean, the biggest thing you give up is 20 You give up 80% of the resolution roughly.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And you're only I mean, the biggest thing you give up is 20 You give up 80% of the resolution roughly.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
One of the nice features about using ECOG or electrocortography is that you can put an array over that entire area safely and you can sample very very densely across the other, you know, across the entire city, let's say.
One of the nice features about using ECOG or electrocortography is that you can put an array over that entire area safely and you can sample very very densely across the other, you know, across the entire city, let's say. And so it doesn't really matter actually at the end of the day if one person's there and the others.
Um most of the time when people are putting an electrode into the brain um there has to be some gain for that and usually that's for recording a higher resolution usually trying to record the activity of single neurons a single cell.
The bug is you give up the resolution at what's happening in the kitchen of that house, but you now get to look at all the houses. Exactly. And you get to do it in a way that's very safe and scalable. And you're only I mean, the biggest thing you give up is 20. You give up 80% of the resolution roughly.