Peter Attia· MD
genetics managed to have better tools for measurement compared to nutritional epidemiology we managed to decode the human genome so we developed platforms that could measure the entire variability more or less in the human genome with pretty high accuracy if you have genotypic platforms that have less than 0.01 error rate this means that you have very accurate measurement as opposed to nutrition where the traditional tools have been questionnaires or survey tools that have very high biases very high recall bias very low accuracy and they do not really capture the diversity of nutritional factors with equal granularity as we can capture the the genetics in their totality of the human genome