The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so that you know we kind of get into trouble sometimes say well you know that people thought like laser was a bogus treatment even my colleagues for many many years thought that low-level laser therapy had no influence on the hair follicle and obviously they're all proven wrong by the exhaustive studies that have been done now and all of the FDA clearances which prove not only safety but certainly hair growth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.