The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we need to sample a very large number of asymptomatic people in New York so I haven't done the statistics on this yet but clearly biostatistician could do this but let's just directionally say it's 3,000 people from each borough 15,000 people who are asymptomatic need to be sampled they need to have probably to PCR and antibody tests separated by five to seven days
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
they need to have probably to PCR and antibody tests separated by five to seven days and what we have to understand is what is the prevalence of corona virus in asymptomatic people