The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Now let's contrast that for a moment by talking about what a false positive is a false positive is defined as Alpha and that's also known as the p-value okay so so let me kind of restate this so so a p-value is basically trying to answer the question what's the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is in fact true
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
a false positive is defined as Alpha and that's also known as the p-value