The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
his thing was the cancer can't grow larger than a BB if it doesn't have new blood vessels that was that was his thing it's stuck at a certain size and so VEGF is the primary way vascular endothelial growth factor is the primary way that you grow new blood vessels if you're a tumor cell
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.