The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
blue zones are associated with people who they have the highest rate of centenarians and super centenarians which is people to live there who'd have to be a hundred or 100 or more than 100 or more than 110 and there are definitely a lot of genetic things that are going on in those places
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, for most of us, our aging is going to be less under genetic control but there are definitely people you might think win the genetic lottery. Right? So, they're very unique and they have the perfect combination. It's probably not one gene, they just have the perfect combination of different gene variants and that somehow enables them to live much longer than the rest of us, it seems even despite having bad health behaviors.