The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the moment we start talking about things that are true in yeast and then true in animals mammals for example or higher adrenals we're talking about a billion years of evolution here so this ranks as one of the few things that seems remarkably conserved over evolution as a general rule that makes it very important
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and once they discovered these essential etapa genes in yeast then it was apparent that there were homologs and mammals and so forth and so on
if you do a blast search you can see them I mean not all of them but the amino acid homology was compelling