The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
testosterone levels even a hundred years ago in men were twice or triple what they are now for the average guy in his 20s why why is that it's because they ate lots of fatty meat and I didn't eat Lucky Charms they didn't eat a whole box of goldfish crackers and pretend that that was nutrition
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.