The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you when I actually look into this there is some hard data it's a bad pun that that penises are shrinking and the anogenital distance is shrinking in men as we evolve as humans as we move on and this is potentially contributing this is potentially connected with these xenoestrogens not just pfas there are many others like phthalates and parabens
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this anal genital distance changes so we know that when animals are exposed to pfas phthalates xenoestrogens this this shrinks which is feminization and it's it's dangerous