The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in fact when you rewind to research from the 1940s hamilton this doctor observed in male castrates that men who were castrated before puberty whereby they'd see a 95 reduction in testosterone and presumably dht levels as a consequence since dht is a metabolite of testosterone those men were protected from developing male pattern hair loss later on in life
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.