The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the median lifespan is the age at which half the mice have died and half are still alive so if um half of the mice in the normal group um died by 800 days and in the drug treated group half of the mice were still alive on day 880 that's 80 days later then that's a 10% increase in lifespan that that's a that's a a nice big jump
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we also always calculate um some measure of Maximum lifespan the actual maximum lifespan the age of death of the last Mouse to die is statistically not very useful not valid because it it varies so much depending on the population size and just the luck of the draw