Rhonda Patrick· PhD
So that is really...at the end of the day gives me a lot of peace of mind that antibody-dependent enhancement is not likely to ever happen with our current vaccines in the United States.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So that is really...at the end of the day gives me a lot of peace of mind that antibody-dependent enhancement is not likely to ever happen with our current vaccines in the United States.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
That's what we have in all of our U.S. vaccines, the pre-fusion viral protein, the pre-fusion spike protein. We are not making post-fusion antibodies against the spike protein, which is so reassuring that antibody-dependent enhancement is so...it's so unlikely to happen because we don't make those antibodies.
So what the brilliant work of Jason McLellan showed is that you could basically lock a viral protein into the pre-fusion complex, and when you then, you know, use that pre-fusion viral protein in a vaccine, you don't make post-fusion antibodies because you don't...your body isn't exposed to that structure of the viral protein.