The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at the overall case fatality rate by age we saw this exorbitant rate in those over age 65 who are male well if you look closely in China almost 70 percent of men over age 65 smoked and less than two percent of women over that same age group so right there you could have a impact on that situation because smoking has always been associated with worse outcome with these kind of viruses
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.