The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you know the length of the eyeball and you know the curvature of the front of the eye and you know the index of refraction of the stuff that's inside the eyeball how bendy this the material is light bendy the material is you can correct for as long as you know where the implant lens is going to reside you can correct for placing that image on the retina
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.